<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Essay Web Blog &#187; cooking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.essayweb.net/category/cooking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.essayweb.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 23:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Indian Style Beef Curry</title>
		<link>http://blog.essayweb.net/2011/11/23/indian-style-beef-curry/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.essayweb.net/2011/11/23/indian-style-beef-curry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.essayweb.net/?p=223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a very common recipe in northern India. This is basic meat &#8220;curry&#8221; &#8211; the way meat is most commonly cooked in homes every day, with no frills or fancies. I’ve described the procedure in some detail for people (like myself) who don&#8217;t know much about the kitchen and prefer to have everything spelled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very common recipe in northern India. This is basic meat &#8220;curry&#8221; &#8211; the way meat is most commonly cooked in homes every day, with no frills or fancies. I’ve described the procedure in some detail for people (like myself) who don&#8217;t know much about the kitchen and prefer to have everything spelled out. If that seems like excess detail to you, please be patient.</p>
<h3><strong>Meat</strong></h3>
<p>The choice of meat is really important to having it turn out well. I&#8217;m only going to talk about beef, though you could easily replace it with lamb or chicken.</p>
<p>Think of this as Indian style stew. So the best cuts of meat for this curry are the same as you would use in a stew. This mean cuts with some fat in them – the more the marbling, the tastier will be, and the less the meat will dry out during the cooking process.</p>
<p>I think that chuck (meat from the shoulder) is best for stew. In many supermarkets, pre-cubed beef for stew is unlabeled as regards its origin, so you have no idea what part of the animal it’s from. Often, it’s actually round (round is meat from the hindquarters). The top part of the round is relatively tender, but the bottom round or the eye of round can also be sold as stewing meat. This is really the worst cut for making stew, in my opinion, since it’s low in fat and also pretty tough. It tends to require long cooking times, and can become even tougher and drier after cooking. Avoid round if you can help it.</p>
<p>That said, this is stew, which is prepared through moist cooking. So it can be pretty tolerant of even the tougher and leaner cuts, <strong>if you take the time and trouble</strong>.</p>
<p>There are a few methods for tenderizing lean and tough cuts of meat. You could use a tenderizer, or you could <a href="http://startcooking.com/blog/271/Marinating-101--An-Introduction-to-Marinating-Beef--Chicken-and-Fish" target="_blank">marinate</a> it for 24 hours. <a href="http://www.wikihow.com/Brine-Meat" target="_blank">Brining</a> also works, as does braising over very low heat (in a crockpot) for several hours. If you are familiar with these methods, by all means try them. My personal favorite is to use a pressure cooker, which is pretty darn amazing at tenderizing tough cuts of meat, not to mention saving a lot of time.</p>
<p>However, these methods are outside the scope of this recipe, so for the best results, please stick to well-marbled chuck for this recipe, unless you are familiar and comfortable with cooking tougher cuts of meat.</p>
<h3><strong>Ingredients</strong></h3>
<ul>
<li>2 pounds of beef for stew, as 1&#8243; cubes</li>
<li>2-3 medium onions, chopped finely</li>
<li>1 ripe tomato, chopped</li>
<li>0.5 cup of plain whole milk yogurt</li>
<li>1.5 teaspoons ground cumin</li>
<li>1.5 teaspoons ground coriander</li>
<li>1 teaspoon ground turmeric</li>
<li>1 teaspoon whole cumin seeds</li>
<li>1 teaspoon ground red pepper</li>
<li>1 bay leaf</li>
<li>5-6 cloves garlic, crushed</li>
<li>Vegetable oil</li>
<li>salt to taste</li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Directions</strong><strong></strong></h3>
<p>Pick a large, heavy pot with a well-fitting lid to cook this. We&#8217;ll be adding a lot of water later, so make sure the pot is big enough. You don&#8217;t want to overfill it. Heavier pots hold heat better and more evenly.</p>
<p>Start by heating the pot over medium heat. When it&#8217;s nice and hot (but not smoking), add a few tablespoons of vegetable oil. Wait a minute for the oil to heat; then drop in the whole cumin seeds. If your stove is on medium, the seeds will start to brown and crackle and pop in about 20 seconds. Add the chopped onions and fry them to a golden brown, stirring frequently. Don’t let them burn!</p>
<p>After they are browned, add the crushed garlic and the chopped tomato. Continue stirring until most of the water is gone from the tomatoes, and the oil separates, about 2-5 minutes on medium heat.</p>
<p>Turn the heat down to medium-low. Now add all the powdered spices plus the bay leaf. Fry the spices for about 1-2 minutes, stirring constantly so that the spices don’t stick to the bottom of the pan and burn. Don’t let anything turn very dark brown or black; or it will taste horrible.</p>
<p>Now add the yogurt, and raise the heat back up to medium. Continue to fry while stirring constantly until the yogurt blends in with the rest of the ingredients, loses its water, and the oil starts to separate.</p>
<p>Finally, we are ready to add the meat. Don’t drop it all in at once. Start with 4-5 cubes, stir constantly to coat the meat on all sides with the spice/onion mixture. The goal now is to fry the meat in this spice mixture, until it’s lightly browned.</p>
<p>You can turn up the heat a bit at this point to speed up the process, provided you stay at the stove and continue stirring. It’s very easy to burn the spice mix if you aren’t careful. Don’t bother so much about turning the meat over so it browns on all sides – this will happen automatically if you concentrate on the real purpose of stirring. The real purpose is to not let food stay/stick to the bottom of the pan. The stirring actually consists of <strong>scraping the bottom of the pan</strong> with the plastic or wood spatula, to make sure nothing sticks there. Keep adding the rest of the meat, 5-6 cubes at time, waiting 30 seconds or so between each addition to make sure the previously added meat has warmed up and is coated evenly.</p>
<p>After all the meat has been added, continue frying for another 5 minutes or so, stirring constantly. You may have to fry a bit longer if your stove isn’t set to high enough heat. The idea is to first reach the point where not much bubbling is going on if you observe a piece of meat at the bottom of the pan (bubbling means there’s significant water present, which means the meat isn’t actually frying yet) and the oil separates, and then to fry for another 3-5 minutes after that.</p>
<p>Now add the water. The amount of water is variable, and depends upon the cut of meat, the type of pot, and the cooking time:</p>
<ul>
<li>If you use well-marbled chuck, the cooking time can be as short as 60 to 90 minutes. With a good, heavy pot with a well-fitting lid, you shouldn’t lose a lot of water in that short time. So 3 cups of water might be fine. Just bring the water to a boil, lower the heat to simmer, cover the pot with the lid and let it cook. Check after 60-70 minutes; and then again at 90 minutes if it isn’t done the first time.</li>
<li>If you use leaner or tougher cuts, which are really not recommended, you will need a lot more water and lot more time. Bottom round or eye of round will be very tough and dry after an hour, pretty much inedible. All meats can be tenderized if cooked long enough. For some cuts you may need 4 hours of cooking, with copious amounts of water. When cooking such cuts, there is no recommended amount of water, it purely depends on how fast the water evaporates, given your stove, your exact heat setting, your pot. The general rule is to have enough water to keep the top of the meat covered at all times. Check every 30-45 minutes, add more water if too much has evaporated away.</li>
</ul>
<p>As mentioned earlier, if you are cooking tough cuts of meat you should really use a crockpot or a pressure cooker. Crockpots take all day to cook (8-12 hours or even longer), so if that’s okay with you, go for it. Pressure cookers are the opposite; they cook the food in a very short time. Both can turn out incredibly tender meat from even the toughest cuts.</p>
<p>From my own experience, cooking stew made from eye of round using a regular pot took about 3.5 hours. The stew was tasty enough, but I wouldn’t do it again. The problem was that at 3.5 hours, the meat starts to shred, with fibers flaking off. Unless you are purposely making shredded beef, this is a bad idea. However, if you cook for a shorter period to avoid shredding, then the meat is too tough and somewhat dry.</p>
<p>Compare that to a pressure cooker. It takes about 15 minutes per pound to cook the same cut. For 2 pounds of eye of round stew, I’d cook it for 15 x 2 = 30 minutes at 15 psi (pounds per square inch pressure), plus 5-10 minutes extra to make it even more tender. Not only does the pressure cooker speed things up considerably, all that pressure inside the cooker tends to keep the moisture inside the meat, so it doesn’t dry out. The result is extremely tender and flavorful. If you are trying to cut down on fat and prefer leaner cuts of meat, this can be a great way to go.</p>
<p>Some tips and final thoughts:</p>
<ol>
<li>Always keep half a cup of fresh water next to the stove when you’re frying the spices. Small mistakes at this stage can ruin the food. You absolutely do not want the spices to burn. If they look like they’re about to burn, simply turning down the heat will probably not be enough. The pot (and the heating elements on electric ranges) retain a lot of heat, and that carryover heat is enough to burn the spices even if you turn it down or off. In such emergencies, just add a tablespoon of water. It will cool down the spices enough to prevent burning/sticking. It only takes a few seconds for that water to evaporate, so you can resume frying as soon as you have the heat under control.</li>
<li>This recipe is for basic meat stew. You can add vegetables for variety if you like. In my opinion, traditional stew vegetables like carrots don’t go well with Indian spices. Anything with even a hint of sweetness is not good. I get the best results with adding potatoes (chopped into 1” cubes), or chopped spinach. You can also add zucchini, or any non-sweet squash. Just add them to the stew at the appropriate time before it finishes cooking. For example, if potatoes take 30 minutes to cook, add them to the stew 30 minutes before it finishes cooking. Remember to raise the heat to high after you add the potatoes to quickly bring it back to a boil, then reduce heat and simmer.</li>
<li>You can add more elaborate spices if you like. This recipe consists of the 4 basic spices – cumin, coriander, turmeric and red pepper. Some other spices that provide variation include cloves (add 3-4 cloves along with the water), ginger (slice 1” cube of peeled fresh ginger into thin strips, add along with garlic and tomato), cardamom (add 5-6 green cardamom seeds along with the water). Other things to add: chopped fresh cilantro (sprinkle a handful on top after the stew has cooked, let sit 10 minutes), chopped nuts (either roast cashews or slivered almonds) that can be added along with the water.</li>
</ol>
<p>That’s it! Always let the meat rest for about 15 minutes after cooking before you serve it. This allows liquids that have been forced out of the meat during the cooking process to seep back in, making the meat more tender. Serve with some <a href="http://blog.essayweb.net/2011/07/31/the-math-of-cooking-perfect-rice/" target="_blank">Indian Basmati rice</a>, or with Indian style bread (in a pinch, you can use warmed up tortilla shells in place of Indian bread – just make sure they are flour tortillas, not corn).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.essayweb.net/2011/11/23/indian-style-beef-curry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Math of Cooking Perfect Rice</title>
		<link>http://blog.essayweb.net/2011/07/31/the-math-of-cooking-perfect-rice/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.essayweb.net/2011/07/31/the-math-of-cooking-perfect-rice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.essayweb.net/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rice is one of the easiest things to cook, but many people are afraid of it because they&#8217;re turned out overcooked soggy mushy rice in the past, and don&#8217;t know how to fix that. The problem is that there are so many recipes available for such a simple thing, and all of them are different. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rice is one of the easiest things to cook, but many people are afraid of it because they&#8217;re turned out overcooked soggy mushy rice in the past, and don&#8217;t know how to fix that. The problem is that there are so many recipes available for such a simple thing, and all of them are different. One recipe printed right on the plastic bag of rice I bought calls for 2 cups of water per cup of rice, another says only 1 cup of water is needed. Others say you should use <a href="http://allrecipes.com/HowTo/How-to-Cook-Rice/Detail.aspx">1.5 cups of water</a> per cup of rice.</p>
<p>Some recipes don&#8217;t even measure water in cups, they just say &#8220;add water until the level is about 1/2&#8243; above the level of the rice in the pot&#8221;. Some call for pre-soaking rice, others say you should never pre-soak.</p>
<p>So who is right? Why so much variation? You could follow two recipes on the web, and produce perfect rice with one and mushy crap with the other. Does that mean one was good and the other was bad? Maybe for you, but it&#8217;s possible that for someone else, the results are reversed, and the crappy recipe produces perfect rice, while your perfect recipe doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>The reason is because even if both of you follow the recipes exactly, there are still differences in the cooking range/stove you used, the pot you used to boil the rice, the exact amount of heat, etc. No cookbook or recipe can account for all these differences. This is why people&#8217;s results can vary so much.</p>
<p>I like a bit of math and science in my cooking, so I decided to put together this post. At the very least, it&#8217;ll explain why people&#8217;s results vary so much and why recipes are so different. Hopefully, it&#8217;ll help you produce perfectly cooked rice every time, without any guesswork.</p>
<h2>What happens when rice cooks?</h2>
<p>Uncooked dry rice grains have some moisture, but not a lot. The usual rice you buy in stores, both long grain and short grain, has about 12% moisture content, meaning each grain is 12% water by weight. Aged rice has a lower moisture content. If you buy aged basmati rice, for example, the moisture may be as low as 7-9%, depending on how long it was aged.</p>
<p>Cooking does two things to the rice. First, it hydrates the rice grain (adds moisture to it), making it swell and increase in size. Second, the heat cooks the rice grains, making them soft and slightly gelatinous.</p>
<p>Properly cooked rice has a moisture level between 58% and 64%. Anything below that range will feel hard and uncooked, and anything over that range will be mushy. You may prefer one end of the range rather than the other, depending upon the type of rice and your personal tastes.</p>
<p>So the goal of cooking is to increase the water content of the rice from 12% to about 60%, and also heat the interior of each grain for a sufficiently long period that it is cooked.</p>
<h2>How much water should you add?</h2>
<p>Water is used for two things &#8211; to hydrate and cook the rice, and to make up for water losses during cooking. The amount of water needed to hydrate the rice is fixed and based solely on the amount of rice, and can be calculated based on desired hydration levels. But the water lost during cooking is very variable, and depends on things such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>length of cooking time</li>
<li>temperature of rice during cooking</li>
<li>shape and size of the pot in which the rice is cooked</li>
<li>how tightly the lid fits on the pot</li>
</ul>
<h3>Water for hydration</h3>
<p>Let&#8217;s start with the easy part first, which is water needed for hydration.</p>
<p>Normally, we measure rice and water in cups. One cup of water is 240 ml, or 240 grams. One cup of rice varies, depending on the type of rice:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">1 cup long grain rice = 185 &#8211; 190 grams</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">1 cup short grain rice = 195 -210 grams</p>
<p>Short grain rice can be packed tighter in the cup, so 1 cup of it weighs more than the same volume of long grain rice.</p>
<p>In order to hydrate this, we need:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">1 cup short grain rice = 0.94 to 1.24 cups of water (for 58% &#8211; 64% hydration)</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">1 cup long grain rice = 0.85 to 1.12 cups of water (for 58% &#8211; 64% hydration)</p>
<p>You can pick the middle of the range and say that 1 cup of long range rice needs 1 cup of water for hydration, while 1 cup of short range rice requires a bit under 1.1 cups of water for hydration.</p>
<h3> Water losses during cooking</h3>
<p>Next we need to figure out how much water will be lost during cooking, and make up for that. Water is lost during cooking due to evaporation. Ideally, we want to lose as little water as possible to evaporation. We can do this by:</p>
<ul>
<li>use pots which have tight fitting lids</li>
<li>choose pots which are narrow and tall, rather than short and wide</li>
<li>use high heat to bring water to a boil quickly, then immediately lower heat to simmer</li>
<li>try to minimize cooking time</li>
</ul>
<p>Consistency is the key to cooking rice, <strong>so don&#8217;t use a different pot each time you cook rice</strong>. Pick one pot and stick to it, so you can learn its quirks and adjust accordingly for them. The most important feature is should be the lid &#8211; pick one that has a tight fitting lid that doesn&#8217;t allow much steam to escape. The heavier the lid, the better. A tall and narrow pot will lose less steam than a wide and shallow pot.</p>
<p>Rice needs to cook at a simmer, which is a point just short of a boil. The temperature of a &#8220;simmer&#8221; is not that much lower than a boil, it&#8217;s just that the rate of heat delivery is such that the temperature is barely maintained, rather than having to keep losing excess heat through big clouds of steam. A &#8220;simmer&#8221; would be about 94-98 °C, as opposed to a boil which is 100 °C.</p>
<p>The easy way to do this is to bring the rice and water to boil, then reduce the heat drastically until it&#8217;s just enough to make bubbles slowly pop at the surface, and to produce a thin cloud of steam on the surface. Cooktops vary, so you will need to find the simmer setting on yours. On a typical cooktop that goes from 1 to 10, simmer might be somewhere between 1 &#8211; 3. You have to experiment and find out.</p>
<p>To reduce total cooking time, it&#8217;s important to bring the rice to a boil quickly. So use the high heat setting on your stove (and stand there and watch, or at least, don&#8217;t leave the stove for prolonged periods). As soon as it comes to a boil, reduce heat to simmer, and let it cook covered for the recommended amount of time.</p>
<h3>To pre-soak or not?</h3>
<p>This factors directly into cooking time, so I&#8217;m going to mention it here. In fact, we can also ask &#8220;should we wash the rice or not&#8221; while we&#8217;re at it.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the difference between washing and pre-soaking? In washing, you add water to rice, swirl it around with your fingers, then drain the water out. Washing removes any loose starch grains adhering to the rice, and also removes any vitamins that the rice has been fortified with.</p>
<p>In the US, by law, all rice is sold fortified with certain B vitamins. This may or may not be useful to you. If you have a varied diet, if you occasionally take vitamin/mineral supplements, or if you already eat other foodstuffs supplemented with vitamins (anything made from flour, cereals, etc. will have added B vitamins), then you don&#8217;t really need the little bit of vitamins that were artificially added to the rice.</p>
<p>I always wash rice for 2 reasons:</p>
<ul>
<li>washing gets rid of loose starch granules, which make rice sticky after cooking</li>
<li>washing can get rid of dirt and dust, after all, rice is a raw agricultural product</li>
</ul>
<p>As I said, the downside is that you also lose those added vitamins. I don&#8217;t care about them because they are very minor, and I get enough vitamins from other foods anyway.</p>
<p>Now, what about pre-soaking? Yes, rice can be pre-soaked <em>without</em> washing. All you have to do is to not add an excess of water during the pre-soaking, so you don&#8217;t have to throw any water away. This way you can pre-soak, and then use the same water for cooking. Any vitamins that leach out remain with the water, and so are absorbed back into the rice when it cooks.</p>
<p>I think pre-soaking is a must, if you have the time. For any kind of rice, pre-soaking will always reduce the cooking time. Why? Because pre-soaking &#8220;wets&#8221; the interior of the rice grains, which allows them to cook much faster and more evenly.</p>
<p>When you cook rice, the heat has to get from the outside of the grain to the interior. This can take time. Let&#8217;s say you cook the rice for 15 minutes. While the outside of each grain reached cooking temperature right when you brought the heat down to a simmer, the inside doesn&#8217;t reach full cooking temperature until much later. So you can have the outside cooking for 15 minutes while the inside only cooks for 5 minutes. This means that either the inside is not fully cooked, or else the outside is overcooked and mushy.</p>
<p>Soaking allows water to reach the inside of the grains, which greatly improves heat transfer into the grain. So the inside starts cooking much sooner, compared to rice that wasn&#8217;t pre-soaked. This allows the total cooking time to be reduced, and for each grain to be cooked as evenly as possible.</p>
<p>Remember, the shorter the total cooking time, the less water you will lose during cooking, and the better the rice will taste, all else being equal.</p>
<p>So in summary, my recommendation is:</p>
<ol>
<li>Always wash the rice first in a couple changes of cold water, specially if you are cooking long grain rice. Long grain rice should not be sticky, and washing makes it less sticky at the end.</li>
<li>Always pre-soak rice in cold water for about an hour, if you have the time. It will make the rice cook much more evenly, and can reduce cooking time in half.</li>
</ol>
<p>You may choose not to wash or pre-soak the rice, but in that case, keep in mind the caveats mentioned above.</p>
<p>So, how much water do you need?</p>
<p>To figure the total amount of water needed, you should add the water required for hydration and the water losses during cooking. For long grain rice, you need 1 cup of water for 1 cup of rice, and for short grain rice you need 1.1 cups of water per cup of rice. This is hydration water only.</p>
<p>Next, you need to add water for cooking losses. This will vary greatly with your setup, the size and width of the pot, the lid, the temperature, etc. All those things mentioned above. If you wanted to be very exact, you could even perform an experiment:</p>
<ol>
<li>Fill the pot with a measured amount (say 3 cups) of water &#8211; water  only, no rice. Close the lid, put it on the stove, bring to a rolling boil.</li>
<li>Immediately lower the heat to simmer, and note the time.</li>
<li>Wait for 30 minutes, then turn the heat off, and remove the pot from the stove. Let it sit on a counter top while it cools to room temperature.</li>
<li>Measure the amount of water left in the pot.</li>
</ol>
<p>Let&#8217;s say you started with 3 cups and you end up with 2 cups after 30 minutes of simmer. So your rate of water loss  due to evaporation was 1 cup per 30 minutes. So if you expect to cook your rice in 15 minutes, you should plan for 1/2 a cup of lost water during cooking. For cooking 1 cup of long grain rice, you would add 1 cup of water for hydration plus 1/2 a cup for water loss, making 1.5 cups of water per cup of rice, for example.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t want to measure the rate of water loss, you will have to discover the right amount of water through trial and error. Here&#8217;s some brief pointers on how to begin:</p>
<p>All cooking times are measured from the point when you turn the heat down to simmer.</p>
<p>Rice that has not been pre-soaked typically cooks in 15 &#8211; 20 minutes, while rice that has been pre-soaked cooks in about 8-10 minutes.</p>
<p>If your pot is really bad in terms of retaining heat (loose fitting lid, too wide and shallow), it will probably lose about a cup of water to evaporation over the 15-20 cooking time of non-pre-soaked rice. This is the maximum amount of water you should start with (for example, cooking 1 cup of long grain rice = 1 cup water for hydration + 1 cup water losses = 2 cups water total). Chances are, your pot isn&#8217;t that bad, so you need to adjust down from 1 cup.</p>
<p>Typically, the range is:</p>
<ul>
<li>the best professional dedicated  rice cookers &#8211; very tight lids, zero water loss</li>
<li>the worst random lidded pot found in the average kitchen &#8211; about 1 cup water loss per 20-30 minutes</li>
<li>pot without a lid &#8211; all bets are off, your mileage will vary. Not recommended at all.</li>
</ul>
<p>Depending on the pot you use, you&#8217;ll be somewhere in that zero to one cup range for water loss. I&#8217;d split the difference and figure on half a cup of water loss and adjust up or down from there through trial and error.</p>
<h2>A note on proportions</h2>
<p>Unless you cook exactly 1 cup of rice at a time, you will need to scale these amounts up or down. Let&#8217;s say you figure out through trial and error (or through the procedure described above) that you need exactly 1.5 cups of water per cup of long grain rice to make the perfect rice. Now let&#8217;s say you decide to cook for friends, so you end up cooking 3 cups of rice instead of 1. Can you scale up the water from 1.5 cups to 4.5 cups (3 x 1.5)?</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve read this far, you know the answer is NO.</p>
<p>Remember, only the water needed for hydration scales with the amount of rice. The water needed to cover water  losses only scales with the cooking time, not with the amount of rice.</p>
<p>When you arrived at that 1.5 cups water per 1 cup rice number, what you were really doing was using 1 cup of water for hydration, and 1/2 a cup of water to cover water losses during cooking. So when you scale this up to 3 cups of rice, you will need 3 x 1 = 3 cups of water for hydration, <strong>but still only 1/2 a cup of water to cover water losses</strong> during cooking. Water losses during cooking only depend on the length of cooking time, and that hasn&#8217;t changed. Yes, it will take longer for 3 cups of rice plus water to come to a boil than it took for 1 cup of rice plus water to come to a boil, but we don&#8217;t measure that time anyway, we measure cooking time from<em> after</em> it&#8217;s come to a boil and the heat is reduced to simmer. This time doesn&#8217;t change whether you&#8217;re cooking 1 cup of rice or 3.</p>
<p>So in this case the correct amount of water needed for 3 cups of rice was 3.5 cups, and if you used 4.5 cups based on the simple calculation of multiplying everything by 3, then you used too much water and your rice will be soggy and mushy. This is one of the commonest mistakes that people make and why rice so often turns out bad.</p>
<p>In this respect, the older method of describing water quantity by &#8220;inches of water covering the rice was better. The idea there is that water mixes  with rice in a roughly 1:1 proportion, and the water level <em>above</em> the level of the rice represents water that will be lost during cooking. So if you know half and inch of water is lost during cooking, then no matter how much rice you have in the pot, half an inch of water on top of that will still be the cooking losses.</p>
<p>This method is also very hit and miss when it comes to sharing recipes, because nobody can say &#8220;half an inch on top of the rice works well&#8221; without seeing the pot you&#8217;re cooking with. This is because half an inch of a wider pot is a lot more water than half an inch of a narrow pot. If you use the same pot regularly, then you may make an observation that half an inch works well for that pot, or maybe 1/3 of an inch, or 2/3rd. This can serve you well for as long as you use the same pot, you&#8217;ll never have to measure water anymore. Just drop in the rice, add enough water to cover the rice plus 1/2 an inch over, and you&#8217;re all set. But if you change pots, you&#8217;ll need new numbers for the new pots. I don&#8217;t like this method much because eyeballing half an inch isn&#8217;t very accurate, I get much better results with measuring volumes in a measuring cup. But it still beats scaling up single  cup recipes naively, without separating out water of hydration and water losses of cooking.</p>
<h2>What&#8217;s a good cooking time to aim for?</h2>
<p>Rice tastes best when it&#8217;s cooked in the shortest time possible, but evenly (inside/outside of each grain cooked to the same degree).</p>
<p>Pre-soaking reduces cooking time, and for this reason alone I think it&#8217;s worth doing whenever you have the time to pre-soak. Always pre-soak for at least 1 hour.</p>
<p>Washing rice is generally a good idea, unless you are making certain short grain varieties that are meant to be sticky. In which case I would still pre- soak, but not wash (not drain the pre-soak water, just use it for cooking).</p>
<p>In my kitchen, when cooking basmati rice (my favorite) which has been pre-soaked for 1 hour, it takes about 8-10 minutes to cook the rice. The time is measured from <em>after</em> I&#8217;ve brought the pot to a rolling boil and lowered the heat to a simmer.</p>
<p>I use a heavy stainless steel pot for cooking rice. Since I have an induction cooktop which requires ferromagnetic pots, the pot is actually triple layered (magnetic stainless steel on the bottom, copper in the middle, regular stainless steel on the inside). I bring the pot to a boil on high heat (the highest setting on the cooking range), then <em>immediately</em> lower the heat to a simmer. The cooktop can be set by power level ( 1 to 10) or by temperature, and I set the simmer by temperature at 210 °F (boiling point is 212 °F). This is what I would call a &#8220;high simmer&#8221;, meaning that it cycles between just below boiling to a mild boil and then drops down again. A low simmer would be more like 200 °F. At these settings, it takes 8-10 minutes of simmer to cook the rice, regardless of the quantity of rice.</p>
<p>After cooking, always leave the rice on the stove (just turn the heat off), and let it sit covered and undisturbed for about 10 minutes before serving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.essayweb.net/2011/07/31/the-math-of-cooking-perfect-rice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Cook Indian Style Lentils</title>
		<link>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/12/20/how-to-cook-indian-style-lentils/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/12/20/how-to-cook-indian-style-lentils/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lentils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spices]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.essayweb.net/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a recipe I&#8217;ve been using for a while. I sort of came up with it on my own, after tinkering with various recipes I found on the web. It&#8217;s very similar to a lot of &#8220;tempered&#8221; dal recipes found in cookbooks, but the spices have been adjusted to my own tastes. If you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a recipe I&#8217;ve been using for a while. I sort of came up with it on my own, after tinkering with various recipes I found on the web. It&#8217;s very similar to a lot of &#8220;tempered&#8221; dal recipes found in cookbooks, but the spices have been adjusted to my own tastes.</p>
<p>If you look up recipes for dal on the internet, you&#8217;ll find hundreds. Maybe more. They all vary in details, like which spices were used, how much of each, when they were added, etc. Partly this is because India is a big country, with many distinct cuisines from different parts of the country. So dal cooked in the north won&#8217;t be the same as dal cooked in the south, or west, or east. Even within a region, there are dozens of variations. Mughlai style food uses a lot of different spices, but not a lot of each. South Indian food might use fewer spices, but some of them will be pretty strong &#8211; enough red-hot chilis, for example, to burn your mouth.</p>
<p>So this is my distillation of many such recipes that I have tried. I&#8217;ve stuck to what I consider are essential spices &#8211; those which I&#8217;d definitely notice a lack of, in the finished product. At the end, I&#8217;ve provided a short list of what else some people add to dal.</p>
<p><strong>Which Lentils?</strong></p>
<p>First, get the right sort of lentils. There are lots of different legumes or &#8220;pulses&#8221; eaten in India. While cooking methods for each are similar, they are not exactly the same. This recipe is for brown lentils (whole, not split), commonly known as &#8220;masoor&#8221; in India.</p>
<p>Brown lentils are very easy to find in most American supermarkets, but be aware they are not exactly the same as Indian brown lentils. Indian lentils are generally smaller in size, more rounded and less flat. They may look darker, though the darkness of supermarket lentils is variable, from greenish to reddish to brownish. Indian lentils have a much richer and more robust flavor.</p>
<div id="attachment_108" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 407px"><a href="http://blog.essayweb.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/masoor_comparison.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-108" title="Brown Lentil Comparison" src="http://blog.essayweb.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/masoor_comparison.jpg" alt="" width="397" height="234" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Comparison of Indian and American Brown Lentils</p></div>
<p>Brown lentils can be found in Indian grocery stores, where they are known as &#8220;masoor dal&#8221;. Whole brown lentils, like in the picture above, are sometimes labeled &#8220;matki masoor&#8221;. It&#8217;s worth it to get the real thing and not the supermarket imitation. There really is a difference.</p>
<p><strong>Ingredients and Method</strong></p>
<p>This is a &#8220;tempered&#8221; dal, meaning, the dal is cooked in two separate stages, which are combined at the end. The purpose of tempering is to keep the butter and fat-soluble spices separate from the rest of the stuff, and cook them for a much shorter time, so the volatile oils in the spices mix in with the butter, and don&#8217;t disappear or acquire an off flavor due to the longer cooking time of the dal itself.</p>
<p>Take 1 cup of lentils (dry volume), and soak in 5-6 cups of cold water for about an hour. Then wash the lentils thoroughly in cold water.</p>
<p>In a large pot, add the following:</p>
<p>- the pre-soaked, washed lentils from the step above<br />
- cold water &#8211; 4 cups<br />
- turmeric powder &#8211; 1 heaped teaspoon<br />
- amchoor powder (dried green mango) &#8211; 1 level teaspoon<br />
- garlic &#8211; 3-4 cloves, peeled and crushed<br />
- onion &#8211; 1 small onion, chopped<br />
- ginger &#8211; either 0.5 teaspoon powder, or a half inch piece fresh, crushed to a paste<br />
- bay leaf &#8211; 1<br />
- salt: about 1.5 teaspoons, or to taste (kosher)</p>
<p>Bring everything to a boil, then reduce heat to simmer, cover the pot, and let it simmer for about 30 minutes to an hour, until the lentils are thoroughly cooked, but not mushy.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, prepare the &#8220;tempering&#8221; mixture. It will take about 10-15 minutes to prepare, so you can start working on it about 15 minutes before the lentils are cooked.</p>
<p>In a large frying pan, melt about 1/2 or 2/3 of a stick of butter. When the butter is hot, start adding stuff in the following order:</p>
<p>1. add half a teaspoon of cumin seeds, fry for about 30 seconds until the seeds start to crackle and pop and turn slightly darker. Don&#8217;t burn them.</p>
<p>2. add one medium chopped onion, fry it while stirring frequently, until the onion changes to a golden brown color. This is different from typical onion-frying instructions, which tell you to fry until it becomes transparent. You are not frying to extract onion flavor (it&#8217;s already there in the lentils from the other onion which you added to them). You are frying to caramelize the onions, to get the sweetish-caramelized-fried-onion flavor, so make sure they&#8217;re golden brown.</p>
<p>3. meanwhile, in a small bowl, mix these spices &#8211; 1 level teaspoon of red chili powder, 1 level teaspoon of ground cumin, 1 level teaspoon of ground coriander, 1 pinch of asafoetida powder. These are all dry powders, so put them in a small cup or bowl and mix them up. Then, after the onions have finished frying and turned golden brown, dump all these mixed spices into the frying pan.</p>
<p>4. Continue to fry for a while, stirring constantly to prevent the spices from sticking to the bottom of the pan and burning. At this point, you might want to turn the heat down to medium (if you had it on high while frying the onions), just to be safe. If it looks like there is any danger of burning the spices, have some water handy, and add a teaspoon or so to prevent burning. But they won&#8217;t burn if you turn the heat down to medium and stir constantly.</p>
<p>5. Fry until the oil starts to separate from the spice/onion mix. This can take anywhere from a minute to 5-6 minutes, depending on how hot your stove is, and whether there was any moisture from the onions remaining in the pan before you added the spices.</p>
<p>6. When the spices have fried, add half a cup of diced tomatoes (canned are fine). Continue to fry until the tomatoes lose their moisture and the oil starts to separate again, which could take another 5 minutes or so.</p>
<p><strong>Bringing Everything Together</strong></p>
<p>Now you are ready to combine the cooked lentils and the tempered spices. Remove the bay leaf from the lentils if it bothers you. Then dump the lentils (with cooking liquid and all) into the frying pan with the spices. Mix everything well. Reduce the heat to simmer, cover the frying pan with a lid, and let simmer for 5 minutes. Then turn off the heat, and let the frying pan sit on the stove for another 5-10 minutes before serving. If you like cilantro, you can sprinkle some fresh chopped cilantro on top, just before serving.</p>
<p>Dal is typically served over a bed of rice, usually basmati rice in North India, or shorter/stickier rice in South India. But it can be eaten with almost anything &#8211; Indian style &#8220;roti&#8221; or &#8220;paratha&#8221;, &#8220;nan&#8221;, etc.</p>
<p><strong>Other Spices</strong></p>
<p>Here are a few spices that I don&#8217;t use for dal, but some other people do.</p>
<p>1. Cardamom and Cloves: they sort of go together, if you add one, you usually add the other as well. If you were to add these, you&#8217;d use 4-5 green cardamom pods (cracked open) and 5-6 cloves. They can be added to the spice mix which goes in the frying pan, after the onions have finished frying. They can add subtle flavors, but I think they&#8217;re more useful for other Indian dishes, and other dals. Brown lentils have a more robust, earthy flavor, and don&#8217;t really need either of these.</p>
<p>2. Mace (known in Indian groceries as &#8220;Javitri&#8221;). This is sort of like nutmeg (in fact, it comes from the same plant), but with a milder flavor. Again, I would probably use it for a lighter and creamier dal, not for this recipe.</p>
<p>3. Fenugreek (known in Indian groceries as &#8220;methi&#8221;). This is actually not a bad thing to add. It has a characteristic smell, which will be more dominant than the actual flavor. A pinch or two of fenugreek added to the spice mix won&#8217;t hurt, and may possibly improve the taste for some people. Fun fact: fenugreek has been used for millenia by people all over the world, as a galactogogue &#8211; something that increases milk production in lactating women. Unlike some folk remedies, it actually works.</p>
<p>4. Carom Seeds (known as &#8220;ajwain&#8221; in Indian groceries). These are more common in South Indian style dals. I never add them. They have a flavor like thyme, only more powerful. You never, ever add them directly to the food. If you use them, use a small amount (1/4 teaspoon to start with), and fry them well in oil to temper them and make them milder.</p>
<p>5. Black Pepper and Garam Masala &#8211; These are both added to increase the &#8220;spiciness&#8221; of the dish. I don&#8217;t add either. Black pepper makes food hotter, and this dal is plenty hot enough with the powdered red chili anyway. Garam Masala is a mix of spices, many of which are already added separately in this recipe, and not needed. If you do add either, the best way would be at the end. Do not fry either black pepper or garam masala. Instead, when you add the cooked dal to the fried onions and spice mix at the end, add both or either of these directly to the food. They don&#8217;t need to be cooked.</p>
<p><strong>Some Variations</strong></p>
<p>Although dal with rice is very yummy (and healthy!) and can be eaten often, sometimes you will want to vary it a bit. Fortunately, brown lentils go well with a lot of stuff, so it&#8217;s easy to vary the recipe by adding something to it.</p>
<p>I usually add potatoes or spinach (one or the other, not both). For potatoes, use a low starch potato like yukon golds, which hold their shape after cooking. Take two medium potatoes (for the amounts in this recipe, which has 1 cup of raw lentils), peel them, and dice them into fairly small pieces. Add them directly to the lentils at the start, and cook along with them.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re using spinach, take a pound of leaf or chopped spinach, and cook it along with the lentils. You might think that this is overcooking the spinach, since the lentils can easily cook for 45 minutes or an hour before they are done, while this is way too long for spinach. But remember, this is an Indian dish, and the purpose of the spinach is mainly to thicken the dal gravy and impart a flavor, so it works well this way.</p>
<p><strong>How to Eat Dal</strong></p>
<p>Most Indians eat dal with rice (preferably basmati), and that&#8217;s probably my favorite way to eat it as well. However, dal is very versatile, and there are plenty of other uses:</p>
<p>1. With bread, in a sandwich. If you have a sandwich grilling machine, leftover dal makes an excellent grilled sandwich. Take 2 slices of bread, butter each on one side, and put some dal in the middle (non-buttered side). Grill in a sandwich maker, or frying pan.</p>
<p>2. In salads. Cold dal goes great with salads. Just make sure it&#8217;s not watery, and that you adjust the amount based on the spiciness. You don&#8217;t want it overwhelming the salad.</p>
<p>3. With pasta. If I have leftover dal, I sometimes make a pasta sauce out of it. Warm the dal in a frying pan over medium heat. The dal should be fairly dry, so drain it first if it&#8217;s too watery. Add about a cup of sour cream per cup of cooked dal, stir until everything is well mixed and warm. Great with shell pasta or macaroni.</p>
<p>Finally, a note on the consistency of dal. If you follow the recipe exactly as described, you&#8217;ll have some water in the dal at the end. Remember, dal thickens when it stands, so you&#8217;ll end up with less water than you can see at the end of cooking.</p>
<p>This is actually perfect, if you&#8217;re planning to eat the dal with rice. Since rice is also dry, the moisture in the dal is a welcome addition. However, if you want to make a grilled sandwich out of the dal, or add it to pasta or salads, you might want drier dal. You can do this in two ways, either reduce the water in the recipe by up to one cup, or else take the lid off the pot during the final 10 minutes of cooking, and let some of the water evaporate. I prefer the second method, but it&#8217;s up to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/12/20/how-to-cook-indian-style-lentils/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recipe: Pork and Rice with Paprika</title>
		<link>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/09/20/recipe-pork-and-rice-with-paprika/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/09/20/recipe-pork-and-rice-with-paprika/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recipes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.essayweb.net/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have some basic recipes in this blog &#8211; here&#8217;s how to cook rice, and here&#8217;s one for making Indian style black beans. It&#8217;s my attempt to make cooking approachable to someone completely unfamiliar with cooking. This is the state in which I found myself some years ago, when I first moved out of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some basic recipes in this blog &#8211; here&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/07/15/cooking-indian-rice/" target="_self">how to cook rice</a>, and here&#8217;s one for making <a href="http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/08/08/indian-style-black-beans/" target="_self">Indian style black beans</a>. It&#8217;s my attempt to make cooking approachable to someone completely unfamiliar with cooking. This is the state in which I found myself some years ago, when I first moved out of the parental home and started living alone. Cooking was a mystery to me, but food is very important, and I love home-cooked food. So I had to approach this completely on my own, with nothing but a few cookbooks and some long distance advice from my mother.</p>
<p>I am a fairly good cook now, but I prefer recipes that need little kitchen time and few ingredients. I don&#8217;t care if it takes 4 hours to cook, so long as I don&#8217;t have to spend more than 10 minutes in the kitchen. So in this blog I only write about stuff that is easy to make and doesn&#8217;t require a large commitment. Here&#8217;s my recipe for pork/rice with paprika. This is easily a main course for any meal.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #339966;">Ingredients</span></h2>
<ul>
<li>pork tenderloin: 2 pounds, defrosted</li>
<li>rice: 1.5 cups, extra long grain, preferably basmati</li>
<li>powdered paprika: about 2 heaped teaspoons</li>
<li>powdered cumin: 1 teaspoon</li>
<li>garlic powder: half a teaspoon</li>
<li>ginger powder: half a teaspoon</li>
<li>freshly cracked black pepper: half a teaspoon</li>
<li>salt: to taste (I usually add 1-1.5 teaspoons)</li>
<li>2-3 medium onions, chopped</li>
<li>2-3 large green bell peppers, seeds removed,  and chopped</li>
<li>a couple teaspoons of oil: olive oil or canola</li>
<li>1 &#8211; 1.5 sticks of butter</li>
</ul>
<h2><span style="color: #339966;">Method</span></h2>
<p>Start by turning on the oven to 450 degrees, and let the rice soak in a large pot with at least 2 inches of cold water covering it.</p>
<p>In a small bowl, mix all the dry spices and salt. Add enough oil to make a paste. Canola oil is best because of the high oven temperature, though you can use olive oil if you wish. Wash the pork tenderloins in cold running water, pat them completely dry with paper towels. Usually, tenderloins are sold in pairs, so a 2 pound package will have 2 tenderloins of approximately 1 pound each.</p>
<p>Put them in a roasting pan, and spoon the spice/oil mixture over them carefully. Spread the spice/oil paste until it completely covers the surface of the meat, making sure to baste both sides. Then adjust the tenderloins in the roasting pan so that they are about an inch apart, and the fat side is up. Pork tenderloins have very little fat, but they have a silvery membrane with a tiny bit of fat in it. You don&#8217;t have to remove the membrane, just put them with whichever side has more of the silvery stuff facing up. Make sure the tenderloins aren&#8217;t poking over the edge of the pan &#8211; if they are too long for the pan, fold the thinner end under itself so they fit within the pan.</p>
<p>After the oven has preheated to 450 F (the amount of time this can take varies with the oven, it will be at least 15 minutes if not more), put the pan with the tenderloins on a rack in the center of the oven, uncovered. Set the timer for 15 minutes at 450 F, to give the meat time to brown. After 15 minutes, turn the oven down to 250 F. Continue cooking until the internal temperature of the meat reaches about 150 F. This usually takes about an hour at 250 F (not counting the first 15 minutes at 450 F). Don&#8217;t cook any longer than an hour at 250 F, or the tenderloins will dry out &#8212; remember, tenderloins have very little fat and can easily get dry if you overcook them. After they have cooked, remove the pan from the oven and let it sit on a counter for at least 15 minutes before messing with it any further.</p>
<p>While the tenderloins are cooking, cook the rice. Make sure it&#8217;s soaked for at least 30 minutes (45 minutes is better). Then wash the rice in 2-3 changes of cold water. Drain the water, then add a measured 2 cups of cold water to it. Bring it to a boil, then turn the heat to low, cover the pot, and let it cook for 25 minutes. After it&#8217;s cooked, remove it from the stove and let it cool down &#8211; with the lid on. Do <strong>not </strong>remove the lid to speed up cooling. It should be allowed to cool for at least 15 minutes before it&#8217;s used further.</p>
<p>Melt the butter in a large skillet (has to be large, eventually the rice will be dumped here as well, later in the recipe). Add the chopped onions and chopped green bell peppers, and let them fry in the hot butter until they are slightly brown.</p>
<p>At this point, you could add other spices to the frying onions if you wished. I sometimes add crushed dry red pepper, and some Indian spices, but they are not necessary.</p>
<p>If you time things right, the onions and peppers will finish frying about 15 minutes after the pork tenderloins are done and  the rice is cooked. It&#8217;s important that both the tenderloins and the rice <strong>be allowed to cool on a counter for at least 15 minutes</strong> after removing from the stove or oven, before you use them further in the recipe.</p>
<p>Cut the tenderloins into small cubes (I prefer them really small, like quarter-inch cubes), and toss them in the pot with the onions and green peppers. There will be some fat that has drained out into the roasting pan. It&#8217;s not a lot, and it&#8217;s very flavorful. If you like, you can drain this fat directly into the skillet with the onions as well. If you&#8217;re trying to cut down on fat, oh well, don&#8217;t bother. Stir everything around for a minute or two.</p>
<p>Finally, dump the rice into the skillet. Turn the heat down to medium-low, stir occasionally to mix the rice in with the meat and fried onions/peppers/spices. The goal is the mix everything thoroughly, to coat the rice grains with butter from the pan so they don&#8217;t stick together. It&#8217;s now ready to serve.</p>
<p>Just before serving, I like to make a final check on the salt. If you had about  1.5 teaspoons of salt in the original spice rub used for the meat, and if you didn&#8217;t toss the liquid that drained out into the roasting pan, but added it to the skillet along with the rice, then you should have enough salt in the prepared dish. But if you tossed the roasting liquid or didn&#8217;t have enough salt to begin with, you might want to add a bit more to the skillet at this time. At any rate, you must check for salt before serving, very likely it will need some adjustment. The easiest way to ruin a dish, specially a meat dish, is to not have enough salt. Salt brings out the flavors in meat. I also add some chopped cilantro right before serving, but that&#8217;s optional. Mix it all up and serve hot.</p>
<p>Makes about 3-4 servings for hungry adult males. More, if you&#8217;re a girl.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #339966;">Notes</span></h2>
<p>This is very much &#8220;comfort food&#8221;, which I identify as basically any form of meat (roasted is more &#8220;comforty&#8221;) plus a starch, suitably salted. The starch could be rice or potatoes, both have their uses. This sort of food has a very primal appeal to our taste buds, possibly going back to when our ancestors first discovered the miracle of cooking, roasting meats and roots at their campfires. Onions and garlic and their botanical kin were probably among the first flavors to be added to food. This is an extra dimension that food holds for me, to be able to use it as a means to relate to our ancestors, to see and smell and taste what they did. Historical food has the same attraction, which is why I sometimes try out historical recipes from Roman times, or medieval food.</p>
<p>Like most stuff with spices, this can be easily refrigerated. If you are cooking for one, simply divide it up into portions in ziplock bags. It easily lasts 2-4 days in the refrigerator. Just nuke it in a microwave before serving.</p>
<p>Learning how to add salt is one of the earliest cooking skills that needs to be mastered. Unless you are following a recipe exactly, you&#8217;ll have to make a decision about how much salt to add. This is not a trivial decision; it&#8217;s one of the most important things you can do to enhance or ruin the flavor of food.</p>
<p>There is no exact science to it. Use good salt. Iodized salt sucks. I prefer kosher salt for general use, sea salt for specific recipes. Start by tasting whatever you intend to salt, to get a &#8220;baseline flavor&#8221;. Add salt sparingly, in steps. You can always add more, but taking it away is harder. Don&#8217;t dump it on to one spot in the food, sprinkle it evenly across all the food, then mix thoroughly and taste it. Does it taste better than the &#8220;baseline&#8221; taste? How does it taste different? You sort of have to learn this for yourself, because no one can explain to anyone else what &#8220;properly salted&#8221; ought to taste like. You have to experience it yourself. Adding salt in steps, a little bit at a time, then checking the taste, is the surest way to learn. After some time, you&#8217;ll be able to taste the food once, eyeball the amount of food, and know how much salt to add without measuring a damn thing. But it takes a little bit of practice. To me, the ideal amount of salt is that which makes the food just short of salty. Meaning, I shouldn&#8217;t be able to taste the salt specifically (unless I&#8217;m eating potato chips), but the flavors in the food should be maximally developed by the salt. You may prefer a bit more, but you will very likely not prefer less. Just experiment a bit and see what you like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/09/20/recipe-pork-and-rice-with-paprika/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cooking and Evolution</title>
		<link>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/09/20/cooking-and-evolution/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/09/20/cooking-and-evolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.essayweb.net/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This line of thought was provoked by an article I read talking about the importance of cooking food in the development of modern humans. I’ve come across a number of articles that talk about the importance of a change in diet in human evolution. The theory is that human diet suddenly improved dramatically, and this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This line of thought was provoked by <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/biology_evolution/article6837386.ece" target="_blank">an article I read</a> talking about the importance of cooking food in the development of modern humans.</p>
<p>I’ve come across a number of articles that talk about the importance of a change in diet in human evolution. The theory is that human diet suddenly improved dramatically, and this marked increase in the availability of calories and nutrients was responsible for the growth of the brain. The improvement in diet is generally tied to either the switch from a primarily herbivorous diet to meat eating, and/or to cooking.</p>
<p>Both make sense in terms of calories and nutrients. Meat is certainly a more densely packed source of nutrients than plants. And cooking increases the bioavailability of nutrients, as it breaks up cell walls and structures that hinder our digestive enzymes from reaching the goodies inside cells.</p>
<p>Of course, this still leaves us without an actual mechanism. Evolution requires heritable changes in the genome. These happen largely by  accident, though their selection depends upon what is advantageous to survival and reproduction. At this point, we don’t know very well exactly which genes are responsible for the differences in our brains, say compared to chimpanzees. We don’t know when these changes first appeared. We don’t know what connection they have to an improved diet.</p>
<p>So one part of evolution, that which is related to the genomic changes responsible for our large brains, is mostly unknown to us. Therefore, I think that ideas such as the change-in-diet leading to big brains scenario, tend to ignore the unknowns and focus only on the natural selection side of evolution. They make certain assumptions, for example, that a large brain will be selected, because it enhances survival and the chance to reproduce. This can be somewhat justified if one thinks about  it (large brains, specially the growth of the forebrain is what allows us to make long range plans, analyze complex problems, etc.), and also there is fossil evidence that shows that in fact it <strong>was </strong>selected. Then there is the assumption that a large brain requires a nutrient rich diet, which can also be justified on the basis of the caloric expenditure in maintaining a large brain. A commonly offered statistic is that for a person at rest, of the amount of energy required to stay alive, <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-does-the-brain-need-s" target="_blank">the brain uses 20%</a>, or 1/5th. The brain is obviously much less than a fifth of the body in terms of mass, yet it uses an extraordinary amount of energy, in proportion. If you keep the total mass of an organism constant, but increase the size of the brain in proportion to the rest of its body, then such an organism will require a more nutrient rich diet. In effect, you have increased its energy requirements, but have not given it bigger jaws to chew food, a bigger gut to digest it, bigger claws to hunt with, etc.</p>
<p>In fact, both anatomy and the fossil record show that humans became less capable of acquiring food as their brains grew, if we look solely at such biological markers such as tooth/jaw size. <em>Homo erectus</em> had smaller jaws than his ancestors, which would have made it harder for him to grind foods down and extract the most energy from them. Our gut became smaller, and less capable of extracting energy from plants. Our muscles became weaker, less capable of overpowering other animals through brute strength alone.<br />
One would think that the timing of these changes would have some correlation with our behavior or change in diet, or the control of fire (for cooking). Unfortunately, the timing is much harder to pin down. No one really knows when humans first learned to control fire. <em>Homo erectus</em>, with his small jaws, evolved 2 million years ago, but the evidence for the widespread use of fire by humans at this time is scanty at best. Most anthropologists don’t believe that fire was used by humans this early, at least, not in any regular, controlled manner, such as would be needed for cooking. Soft tissues don’t fossilize well, so while we can study humans and chimps today and recognize that the chimp gut is much more suited for eating raw plant material than the human gut, we don’t really know when we evolved our more carnivorous digestive systems.</p>
<p>This leaves a chicken versus egg conundrum. Which came first, the big brain or the adaptations to the big brain lifestyle? Which was responsible for the other? This may be a silly question on the face of it, because obviously one is useless without the other. What’s the point of having a modern jaw or gut if you don’t also have the bigger brains that give you the means for filling that gut with food? On the other hand, how do you sustain that brain and give it energy without eating a more nutrient-rich diet?</p>
<p>So it seems that speaking in terms of absolute causality, one thing causing the other is somewhat simplistic. They probably both happened together, one reinforcing the other, and happened gradually. We didn’t go suddenly from a chimp-sized brain to a human-sized one, as we know from the fossil record. There are many intermediate stages of the brain growing progressively larger. The change in diet, therefore, and the behavioral changes accompanying both the change in diet and the larger brain, must have happened concomitantly.</p>
<p>It’s interesting at this point to bring in the factor we’ve ignored all along – that there must be genomic changes that produce all the anatomical differences – jaws, teeth, gut and brains. These genomic changes also need to be accounted for, and tied into the selection mechanism. A high nutrient diet is obviously not enough; otherwise large cats such as lions and tigers would be smarter than us. They might not cook, but they eat enough high nutrient food to be able to support bigger brains. They have evolved as long as us, why didn’t they learn to cook,  why didn&#8217;t they evolve bigger brains?</p>
<p>This brings us back to selection, and fuzzier areas of anthropology such as social behavior and interactions, etc. We have bred dogs for a few thousand years, for example, and we have breeds of dogs today that look very different from each other. Not only is there is a difference in size and color of the fur, but there are also differences in the brain. Some breeds of dogs are smarter than others. We did this by a fairly simple process of selection – pick dogs that have the traits you want, breed them to produce a new generation, keep selecting for the desirable traits and reinforcing them through successive generations. Even with no knowledge of DNA or even Mendellian genetics, our ancestors were able to do this for dogs. We have also bred cows, pigs, goats, sheep, etc. – the modern domesticated forms of which are quite different from their wild ancestors. Not to mention the similar and parallel process of breeding food plants.</p>
<p>So even without postulating major and sudden changes in the genome, those which suddenly introduced a “game changer” mutation so far as the brain was concerned, it’s possible to see that humans could have become progressively smarter simply if the natural variation in smartness among a population was selectively reinforced over generations, the same way we breed dogs. Of course, this doesn’t mean that you can breed dogs to a human level of intelligence, there may well be certain required mutations, and these have to happen first. You can’t select for what doesn’t exist. But at a point where we don’t fully understand the nature of these key mutations, we can’t really talk about how essential they were. Perhaps they could happen in other species too. Perhaps there are a dozen different ways to get the same result, and if mutation “A” doesn’t happen, mutation “X” can provide the similar benefits. I’d rather not speculate about this until we have more information to speculate with.</p>
<p>So I think such articles (as the one referenced above, which talks about the relation of diet to human evolution) speculate about the remainder of the problem, the mutually reinforcing effect of the selection of traits which are part of the natural variability of a population, and the behavioral consequences of selecting such traits. You set a species on a certain path, on which a greater reliance on the brain cuts out some options while expanding others, and the options that are promoted require even greater brain power to work well. It’s interesting to speculate what put us on this path, why we seem to be the only species on it. What set of circumstances came together at the right time for this to happen. The drying climate and spread of grasslands, the change from an arboreal to a savannah type lifestyle, the appearance of bipedality at this critical juncture when these big new ecological niches suddenly opened up, the development of more and more hand flexibility with a greater range of movement in the opposable thumb (compared to other primates), the social interactions, etc. There were so many changes happening at roughly the same time to the same species, somewhere this set us off on a path to bigger brains.</p>
<p>The article that set me off on this line of thought, of course, talks about something narrower. It talks about the relationship of cooking to gender roles, the development of the male-female bond, which is marriage today. This seems less an evolutionary question than an anthropological one. The evolutionary part is the importance of cooked food in the development of our brains, which I have speculated about. The anthropology part is relating this importance to something else, namely male-female pairing. I am not qualified to speculate about the anecdotal evidence offered about some primitive societies where food is more important than marital fidelity. Nor do I have any evidence that women tended the home fires, though it seems likely if men were the hunters and spent less time at the home camp. This seems to be supported by fossil evidence, such as hunting related injuries, as well as by anthropological evidence. You can speculate that the importance of cooked food was critical enough to shape our behavior patterns in other ways, such as pair-bonding between males and females. But just because a theory seems to make sense doesn’t mean it’s true, so I guess we’ll need to see some more physical evidence before placing much value on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/09/20/cooking-and-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indian Style Black Beans</title>
		<link>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/08/08/indian-style-black-beans/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/08/08/indian-style-black-beans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 00:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black beans turtle cooking indian food]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.essayweb.net/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Black beans, or turtle beans as they are sometimes called, are my favorite kind of beans. I was in Miami for a while, and ate a lot of Cuban black beans and rice, which is delicious. I like the beans + rice combination, since it&#8217;s a great protein source, and the beans and rice complement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black beans, or turtle beans as they are sometimes called, are my favorite kind of beans. I was in Miami for a while, and ate a lot of <a href="http://allrecipes.com/Recipe/Cuban-Black-Beans-II/Detail.aspx" target="_blank">Cuban black beans and rice</a>, which is delicious. I  like the beans + rice combination, since it&#8217;s a great protein source, and the beans and rice complement each other in terms of providing all the essential amino acids. Also, it makes a change from my usual high-meat diet. If you are vegetarian, this could be one of your main sources of protein.</p>
<p>Eventually, I learned to cook them at home. Since I like my food a lot spicier, I adapted the recipe to use a mix of Indian spices. This is a bit odd, because black beans are not common in India. But it&#8217;s very tasty.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #008000;">Ingredients</span></h2>
<ul>
<li>dry black beans: 0.5 pound</li>
<li>chopped onions: 1 cup (you can increase this to 1.5 or 2 cups)</li>
<li>garlic: 4-5 small cloves, crushed</li>
<li>diced tomatoes: 0.5 cup (canned is fine)</li>
<li>crushed, dried red pepper flakes: 1 tablespoon (or more, if you like)</li>
<li>salt: to taste (I would add about 1.5 teaspoons)</li>
<li>coriander powder: 1.5 teaspoons</li>
<li> cumin powder: 1 teaspoon</li>
<li>turmeric powder: 1 teaspoon</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asafoetida" target="_blank">asafoetida</a>: a pinch (about 1/8 teaspoon or a bit less)</li>
<li>dried green mango powder (<a href="http://www.theepicentre.com/Spices/amchur.html" target="_blank">amchoor</a>): 1 teaspoon</li>
<li>vegetable oil: about 1/3 cup (I use canola oil)</li>
<li>chopped fresh cilantro leaves (optional)</li>
</ul>
<p>Please note that &#8220;teaspoon&#8221; or &#8220;tablespoon&#8221; mean a level teaspoon or tablespoon. Don&#8217;t leave it partially empty and don&#8217;t heap it.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #008000;">Method</span></h2>
<p>Soak the beans overnight. This is very important, not optional. Use at least 8 cups of water for the half pound of dry beans in this recipe. Overnight means at least 8 hours, though 10-12 hours would be better. If your kitchen is very hot, you can put the soaking beans in the lowest compartment of your refrigerator to prevent fermentation. For average temperatures (around 75 F), this is not necessary, just cover it and leave it at room temperature overnight.</p>
<p>After they have soaked, wash the beans several times in cold water. You&#8217;ll notice that the water comes out black. This is stuff you want to wash away, so wash the beans in at least 5-6 changes of water to get rid of the black stuff. Or you can just pour them in a large sieve or colander and run fresh cold water through them for a few minutes, while stirring with a finger.</p>
<p>Put the beans together with <strong>half</strong> the chopped onions, salt, turmeric, dried green mango powder, garlic, diced tomatoes and 6 cups of fresh cold water in a pot. Cover the pot with a well-fitting lid, bring it to a boil over high heat, then reduce the heat to low and let it simmer for at least 2 &#8211; 2.5 hours, until the beans are thoroughly cooked.</p>
<p>When the beans are almost done, heat the oil in a large frying pan or wok &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t matter what sort of pan you use so long as it&#8217;s big enough to hold the cooked beans, which you will add later. Toss in a pinch of asfoetida and the remaining half of the chopped onion. Fry the onion until golden brown. Add the crushed red pepper, coriander and cumin, and continue to fry over medium heat for 1 minute longer. Pour the cooked beans (including all the cooking liquid in the pot) into the frying pan. Turn the heat to low, mix everything together thoroughly. At this point, you can add the chopped cilantro leaves if you&#8217;re using them. Some people hate cilantro, so it&#8217;s optional. Continue stirring for a minute or two, then cover the frying pan and turn off the heat. Let it sit for at least 5-10 minutes over the still-warm stove before serving.</p>
<p>Prepare the rice separately. I prefer Indian style Basmati rice. Here&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/07/15/cooking-indian-rice/" target="_self">how to cook Basmati rice</a>. Serve the beans over a bed of rice.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #008000;">Notes</span></h2>
<p>Most cookbooks say that you shouldn&#8217;t cook beans with salt or acids, because salt and acids increase the cooking time. This recipe calls for both (salt, acid in the diced tomatoes). I personally think that adding the salt and diced tomato at the beginning improves the flavor, and I don&#8217;t mind cooking the beans for 2.5 hours instead of 1 hour, to compensate. If you want, you can leave out the salt and diced tomatoes. Cook the beans until tender (will probably take 1 to 1.15 hours), then add the salt and diced tomatoes and cook for another 15 minutes to let the flavors mix in.</p>
<p>You can get all the spices used in this recipe at an Indian grocery. The &#8220;dried green mango powder&#8221; is known as &#8220;amchoor&#8221;. This is used for giving the food a slightly acidic taste. It&#8217;s not the same as adding lime juice: it&#8217;s a bit sweeter and has a richer flavor. You can use either amchoor or imli powder (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamarind" target="_blank">imli </a>is dried tamarind pods, also used for the same purpose as amchoor, and also found in Indian groceries). If there&#8217;s no Indian grocery handy, you can leave out the amchoor and asfoetida. The beans won&#8217;t taste exactly the same, but they will still be delicious. The rest of the spices are easily found at any grocery.</p>
<p>If you are in a hurry, you can also use canned black beans, or use the quick soak method. Canned beans do not require soaking: just drain the liquid, wash the beans thoroughly in cold water, then add the other ingredients and start cooking. You might want to reduce the amount of water from 6 cups to 5 cups. Other than that, recipe is the same. Canned beans are not as tasty as dry beans that have been soaked. For the quick soak method, take the dry beans and add 8 cups of cold water. Put it on the stove and bring to a boil. Let it boil for 2 minutes (don&#8217;t walk away at this point, you have to be near the stove to make sure you don&#8217;t boil for longer than 2 minutes). Then turn off the heat, cover the pot, and let it sit for 2 hours. Then you can wash the beans in cold water and proceed with the rest of the recipe unchanged.</p>
<h2><span style="color: #008000;">Variations</span></h2>
<p>For a change, you can add other ingredients to the black beans. Two things that go specially well with black beans are potatoes and spinach. This is how I would add them:</p>
<p>1. <strong>Potatoes</strong>: I use low-starch potatoes that hold their shape while cooking. This means any kind of white or red potatoes, or perhaps Yukon Golds. You can peel them if you want. I don&#8217;t usually peel them, but I scrub them well in running water. Then chop them up into small pieces, about quarter inch cubes. You can add them directly to the beans during the last 45 minutes of cooking. Just turn the stove back to high, while stirring, and wait for everything to come to a boil again after adding the potatoes. Then turn the heat back down to simmer and continue cooking. An alternative is to pat the cubed potatoes dry, put them on a plate and microwave on high for about 2 &#8211; 3 minutes before adding them to the beans. This ensures that they are hot (and partially cooked), so the beans continue to simmer even after addition of the potatoes. In this case, I&#8217;d add them a bit later, perhaps 30 minutes before the beans are done.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Spinach</strong>: I would use a pound of chopped spinach. If it&#8217;s frozen, turn up the heat on the beans when there are 45 minutes left on the cooking time, and add the frozen spinach. Bring it to a quick boil, turn the heat back down to simmer, and continue cooking for the remainder of the time.</p>
<p>There are probably other things you could also add in place of potatoes or spinach, though in my experience, those two are best. Avoid green peas or corn or carrots, or anything with a sweet taste &#8212; it doesn&#8217;t blend with the other flavors. Chopped zucchini is good, so are cauliflower florets. Just add them at the appropriate time to ensure that they are properly cooked, erring on the side of slightly overcooking. Indian style vegetables are not supposed to be crunchy. You sort of want them to hold shape and not fall apart, but otherwise they should be quite soft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/08/08/indian-style-black-beans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cooking Indian Rice</title>
		<link>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/07/15/cooking-indian-rice/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/07/15/cooking-indian-rice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cooking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[basmati rice cooking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.essayweb.net/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;d like to start by saying that I am a great fan of Indian food, specially north Indian styles, such as Mughlai, Awadhi, Kashmiri, etc. I am lucky enough to live in a city which has lots of Indian restaurants, so it&#8217;s not hard to get Indian food. But since I also enjoy cooking, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to start by saying that I am a great fan of Indian food, specially north Indian styles, such as Mughlai, Awadhi, Kashmiri, etc. I am lucky enough to live in a city which has lots of Indian restaurants, so it&#8217;s not hard to get Indian food. But since I also enjoy cooking, I don&#8217;t eat out that often, and prefer to make the same things at home.</p>
<p>North Indian rice is my favorite kind of rice &#8211; very long grains, not sticky or mushy, with a slightly nutty flavor. It goes well with almost any Indian curry, dals (lentils), or in rice dishes like biryani or pilaf. And it is so easy to make, but I see a lot of people mess it up for some reason, and end up with a mushy goo that looks and tastes horrible.</p>
<p>There is no single &#8220;right&#8221; way to cook north Indian style rice. Some people pre-soak, some don&#8217;t. Some add the rice to boiling water, some add cold water to the rice and let it all heat up together. Some people parboil the rice instead. Some start it off on the stovetop and finish it in the oven. All of these methods can produce excellent cooked rice, if done properly.</p>
<p>However, most of the time I use the method described below, because in my opinion it&#8217;s the easiest and it&#8217;s very hard to make mistakes when you use it. So here, without further ado, is how to cook north Indian rice.</p>
<h5>Step One &#8211; Get the Right Kind of Indian Rice</h5>
<p>There are dozens of varieties of rice eaten in India. For north Indian style cooking, you need to get Basmati rice, nothing else will do. You can apply these methods to other kinds of rice, as I mention later, but for now please forget that and just get Basmati rice.</p>
<p>Basmati is an extra-long grain fragrant rice with a slight nutty aroma, that comes from India. The best Basmati is from the foothills of the Himalayas (such as rice from Dehradun). Punjabi Basmati is also good. If you can, try to avoid American Basmati (Texmati), at least until you have tried Indian Basmati and can tell the difference in flavors.</p>
<p>Basmati comes in white grains (white Basmati) or golden &#8211; brownish grains (golden Basmati). White Basmati has more of the hull removed, and cooks faster. Again, if you&#8217;re new to cooking rice, stick to white Basmati, until you know how to cook it properly. Brown basmati is the same, except it takes longer to cook. I prefer white Basmati.</p>
<p>The better kinds of Basmati are aged. Aging decreases the moisture content of the grain, and improves the taste. Aging 1 &#8211; 2 years is typical for  Basmati. This cooking method works for both aged and un-aged Basmati, with a slight difference which I&#8217;ll mention below.</p>
<h5>Step Two &#8211; Pre Soak the Rice</h5>
<p>This is a controversial topic. Some cookbooks recommend soaking, others don&#8217;t. It&#8217;s possible to cook good rice either way, but for this method, soaking is a must. If you don&#8217;t pre-soak and follow the rest of the recipe, you&#8217;ll end up with bad rice, because the rest of the recipe assumes the rice was pre-soaked.</p>
<p>Put the dry rice in a large pot, add cold water (about 3-4 times the volume of the rice) and let it sit at room temperature. I typically let it sit for 30 minutes to 1 hour, undisturbed. If you are using aged Basmati, you can soak for a bit less, but I&#8217;d still soak for about 20 &#8211; 30 minutes.</p>
<h5>Step Three &#8211; Wash the Rice</h5>
<p>You can wash the rice before or after the soaking. I do it after. When the rice has finished soaking, drain out the water. You can use a sieve or cheesecloth to drain if you want. I just tilt the pot and let the water drain out, using a cupped hand to prevent any rice from escaping. You don&#8217;t need to drain every last drop of water, just most of it.</p>
<p>Now add lots of cold water, stir the rice a couple times with your finger, and drain it again. Repeat this 3 &#8211; 4 times. Washing the rice in this way gets rid of loose starch around the rice grains, which will cause the grains to stick together unless it&#8217;s removed. Again, if you&#8217;re using aged Basmati, you can wash it fewer times, or even dispense with the washing. I&#8217;d wash it at least once anyway, it doesn&#8217;t hurt the rice.</p>
<h5>Step Four &#8211; Cook the Rice</h5>
<p>After the final wash, drain all the water. It doesn&#8217;t matter if a few drops remain, just not too much. Now add cold water for cooking. The general rule I follow is that I add 1.0 &#8211;  1.3 times the volume of water as the initial volume of dry rice. So for 1 cup of rice (measured when the rice was dry, before soaking), I would add 1 to 1.3 cups of water, depending on a few factors:</p>
<ul>
<li>If I drained it really well after the last wash (used a sieve or cheesecloth or colander), I would add more water, like 1.25 &#8211; 1.3 cups water per cup of dry rice. If I didn&#8217;t drain it so well, I&#8217;d adjust for that accordingly, by adding slightly less water.</li>
<li>If you like you rice slightly chewy, add less water (1.0 -1.1 cups per cup of dry rice). If you like it softer and moister, add a bit more (1.2 &#8211; 1.3 cups per cup of dry rice).</li>
<li>If the rice is aged 1+ years, add a bit less water. Just a tiny bit less.</li>
</ul>
<p>Turn the stove to high heat and put the pot with the rice and water on it. Add some unsalted butter (about a tablespoon). Do not add salt or anything else. Bring it to a vigorous boil, stirring once or twice with a spoon to make sure the rice isn&#8217;t sticking to the bottom. Turn the heat down to simmer, put the lid on the pot, and let it simmer for about 25 minutes. Don&#8217;t open the pot during this time, don&#8217;t fuss with it at all. Just let it be.</p>
<p>After 25 minutes you can open the pot and test the rice. I usually pick off a couple grains of rice from the top with a fork, and taste them. If they&#8217;re done, remove the pot from the heat. If not, give it another few minutes. It can take 20 &#8211; 35 minutes to cook the rice, depending on the rice and your definition of &#8220;simmer&#8221;.</p>
<h5>Step Five &#8211; Serve</h5>
<p>After the rice has cooked, remove it from the stove, put the lid back on, and let it sit for at least 5 minutes. Then you can serve it. I take a fork and (gently!) scrape the top of the rice to loosen the grains, and then pour from the pot directly into a plate. Just keep scraping more of the rice loose with a fork and pouring until you&#8217;re done.</p>
<h5>Some Extra Notes</h5>
<p>Never, ever add more cold water to cooking rice, even if the rice appears dry. If you followed the recipe above, and check after say 20 minutes, you may find the rice not thoroughly cooked and the water all gone. Don&#8217;t worry, just put the lid back on and give it more time. If the heat is down to simmer, you can leave it for quite a while and it won&#8217;t burn. Check back at 35 minutes or so, and the rice should be done.</p>
<p>&#8220;Simmer&#8221; really means &#8220;simmer&#8221; &#8211; very low heat. Since stoves are different, you have to find out what the simmer setting is on your stove. Think of it this way: if you take a pot of plain tap water (with nothing added to it) and bring it to a rolling boil, then simmer would be the setting to which you could set your stove so that the surface of the water continues to gently steam, but isn&#8217;t bubbling. If you cook the rice at higher heat, you can turn it to mush. Or you can burn it at the bottom, making a mess of the pot. At &#8220;simmer&#8221; the rice is safe for a long time. I&#8217;ve accidentally cooked rice for as long as an hour, and it&#8217;s still quite edible. It gives you a wide safety range and allows you to stop cooking when the rice tastes right to you.</p>
<p>You can use the same method, with the exact same quantities of water for ordinary long grain rice, not just Basmati. Even the cheapo Riceland Extra Long Grain rice sold at most grocery stores (which isn&#8217;t Basmati, or even extra long grained &#8211; it&#8217;s just milled to make each grain thinner and look &#8220;long grained&#8221;) works well with this recipe. Each grain will be fluffy and separate. Of course, it won&#8217;t taste or smell the same as Basmati.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.essayweb.net/2009/07/15/cooking-indian-rice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

